近日，一则‘先动手的被罚100元，还手的被拘3天’的案例引发公众热议。很多人疑惑：明明是对方先打人，为何还手反而处罚更重？其实，这一处理结果并非‘各打五十大板’，而是基于法律对‘互殴’与‘正当防卫’的区分。根据《治安管理处罚法》，打架斗殴属于扰乱公共秩序的行为，无论谁先动手，只要双方都实施了攻击行为，通常会被认定为‘互殴’。在司法实践中，若还手行为超出必要限度，不具备防卫意图，就难以构成正当防卫。因此，先动手者因情节较轻可能仅被罚款；而还手者若造成更严重后果或被认为激化矛盾，可能面临行政拘留。值得注意的是，2023年最高检与公安部联合发布的《关于依法妥善办理轻伤害案件的指导意见》明确指出，应准确区分正当防卫与互殴，避免‘谁伤重谁有理’的错误倾向。如果还手是为了制止正在进行的不法侵害，且手段合理、未明显超过必要限度，应依法认定为正当防卫，不负法律责任。因此，面对冲突，最好的方式是及时报警、保留证据，而非以暴制暴。法律鼓励理性维权，而非‘以牙还牙’。
Recently, a case where ‘the person who struck first was fined 100 yuan, while the one who retaliated was detained for three days’ has sparked public debate. Many wonder: if the other party initiated the attack, why is the responder punished more severely? In fact, this outcome isn’t about ‘splitting blame equally,’ but rather reflects the legal distinction between ‘mutual combat’ and ‘self-defense.’Under China’s Public Security Administration Punishments Law, physical altercations are considered disruptions of public order. If both parties engage in violence, it’s typically classified as ‘mutual fighting,’ regardless of who started it. In judicial practice, retaliatory actions lacking clear defensive intent or exceeding necessary limits usually don’t qualify as lawful self-defense. Thus, the initial aggressor might receive a lighter penalty like a fine, while the responder—especially if deemed to have escalated the conflict or caused greater harm—could face administrative detention.Notably, a 2023 joint guideline from China’s Supreme People’s Procuratorate and Ministry of Public Security emphasizes accurately distinguishing self-defense from mutual combat and cautions against the flawed notion that ‘whoever is more injured is automatically right.’ If someone responds solely to stop an ongoing unlawful attack, using reasonable force without significantly exceeding necessity, their action should be recognized as legitimate self-defense and carry no legal liability.Therefore, in conflicts, the best approach is to call the police immediately and preserve evidence—not resort to violence. The law encourages rational resolution, not retaliation.
原创文章，作者：admin，如若转载，请注明出处：https://ktez.cn/5931.html