近期，美国政府所谓‘购岛’的闹剧再度引发关注。这一说法源于个别政客和媒体炒作美国可能从丹麦手中‘购买’格陵兰岛的言论。早在2019年，时任美国总统特朗普就曾公开表示对格陵兰岛的兴趣，称其具有战略和经济价值，并暗示愿意出资收购。此举遭到丹麦政府和格陵兰自治政府的坚决反对，被广泛批评为殖民思维的回潮。格陵兰是丹麦王国的自治领土，拥有高度自治权，其外交与国防事务虽由丹麦负责，但当地民众对主权归属有明确共识：格陵兰属于格陵兰人。近年来，随着北极地区地缘战略地位上升，包括美国、俄罗斯、中国在内的多国加强了在该区域的存在，但任何试图通过‘购买’方式获取领土的行为都违背现代国际法和主权平等原则。目前，尽管美国部分政界人士仍不时提及‘购岛’设想，但主流舆论和国际社会普遍认为此类言论既不现实也不合法。随着全球对国家主权和原住民权利的尊重日益增强，这场‘购岛’闹剧正逐渐失去市场，有望走向终结。
Recently, the so-called U.S. government ‘island purchase’ controversy has once again drawn public attention. This notion stems from sensational claims by certain politicians and media outlets suggesting that the United States might attempt to ‘buy’ Greenland from Denmark. As early as 2019, then-U.S. President Donald Trump openly expressed interest in Greenland, citing its strategic and economic value and even hinting at a potential acquisition. The proposal was firmly rejected by both the Danish government and Greenland’s self-governing authority, widely condemned as a resurgence of colonial thinking.Greenland is an autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark. While Denmark handles its foreign affairs and defense, Greenland enjoys extensive self-rule, and its people are unequivocal about their sovereignty: Greenland belongs to Greenlanders. In recent years, as the Arctic region gains geopolitical significance, countries including the U.S., Russia, and China have increased their presence there. However, any attempt to acquire territory through ‘purchase’ contradicts modern international law and the principle of sovereign equality.Although some U.S. political figures occasionally revive the ‘purchase’ idea, mainstream opinion and the international community largely view it as unrealistic and unlawful. With growing global respect for national sovereignty and indigenous rights, this ‘island-buying’ spectacle is losing traction and appears poised to fade away.
原创文章，作者：admin，如若转载，请注明出处：https://ktez.cn/20434.html